It is undebatable, and cannot be amended or have any other subsidiary motion
applied to it. The effect of an amendment may be obtained by calling for, or
moving, the previous question on a different set of the pending
questions (which must be consecutive and
include the immediately pending question), in
which case the vote is taken first on the motion which orders the previous
question on the largest number of
questions. It may be applied to any debatable
or amendable motion or motions, and if unqualified it applies only to the
immediately pending motion. It may be qualified so as to apply to a series of
pending questions, or to a consecutive part
of a series beginning with the immediately pending
question. It requires a two-thirds vote for
its adoption. After the previous question has
been ordered, up to the time of taking the last vote under it, the
questions that have not been voted on may be
laid on the table, but can have no other subsidiary motions applied to them.
An appeal made after the previous
question has been demanded or ordered and
before its exhaustion, is undebatable. The previous
question, before any vote has been taken
under it, may be reconsidered, but not after its partial execution. As no one
would vote to reconsider the vote ordering the previous
question who was not opposed to the previous
question, it follows that if the motion to
reconsider prevails, it will be impossible to secure a two-thirds vote for the
previous question, and, therefore, if it is
voted to reconsider the previous question it
is considered as rejecting that question and
placing the business as it was before the previous
question was moved. If a vote taken under the
previous question is reconsidered before the
previous question is exhausted, there can be
no debate or amendment of the proposition; but if the reconsideration is after
the previous question is exhausted, then the
motion to reconsider, as well as the
question to be reconsidered, is divested of
the previous question and is debatable. If
lost, the previous question may be renewed
after sufficient progress in debate to make it a new
question.
The Form of this motion is, “I move [or demand, or call for] the
previous question on [here specify the
motions on which it is desired to be ordered].” As it cannot be debated or
amended, it must be voted on immediately. The form of putting the
question19 is, “The previous
question is moved [or demanded, or called
for] on [specify the motions on which the previous
question is demanded]. As many as are in
favor of ordering the previous question on
[repeat the motions] will rise.” When they are seated he continues, “Those
opposed will rise. There being two-thirds in favor of the motion, the
affirmative has it and the previous
question is ordered on [repeat the motions
upon which it is ordered]. The question is
[or recurs] on [state the immediately pending
question]. As many as are in favor,” etc.
If the previous question is ordered the chair immediately proceeds to put to
vote the questions on which it was ordered
until all the votes are taken, or there is an affirmative vote on postponing
definitely or indefinitely, or committing, either of which exhausts the
previous question. If there can be the
slightest doubt as to the vote the chair should take it again immediately,
counting each side. If less than two-thirds vote in the affirmative, the
chair announces the vote thus: “There not being two-thirds in favor of the
motion, the negative has it and the motion is lost. The
question is on,” etc., the chair stating
the question on the immediately pending
question, which is again open to debate and
amendment, the same as if the previous
question had not been demanded.
The question may be put in a form similar
to this: “The previous question has been
moved on the motion to commit and its amendment. As many as are in favor of
now putting the question on the motion to
commit and its amendment will rise; those opposed will rise. There being
two-thirds in favor of the motion, the debate is closed on the motion to
commit and its amendment, and the
question is on the amendment,” etc. While
this form is allowable, yet it is better to conform to the regular
parliamentary form as given above.
The Object of the previous
question is to bring the assembly at once
to a vote on the immediately pending
question and on such other pending
questions as may be specified in the
demand. It is the proper motion to use for this purpose, whether the object
is to adopt or to kill the proposition on which it is ordered, without
further debate or motions to amend.
The Effect20 of ordering the previous
question is to close debate immediately, to
prevent the moving of amendments or any other subsidiary motions except to
lay on the table, and to bring the assembly at once to a vote on the
immediately pending question, and such
other pending question as were specified in
the demand, or motion. If the previous
question is ordered on more than one
question, then its effect extends to those
questions and is not exhausted until they
are voted on, or they are disposed of as shown below under exhaustion of the
previous question. If the previous
question is voted down, the discussion
continues as if this motion had not been made. The effect of the previous
question does not extend beyond the session
in which it was adopted. Should any of the
questions upon which it was ordered come
before the assembly at a future session they are divested of the previous
question and are open to debate and
amendment.
The previous question is
Exhausted during the session as follows: (1) When the previous
question is unqualified, its effect
terminates as soon as the vote is taken on the immediately pending
question. (2) If the previous
question is ordered on more than one of the
pending questions its effect is not
exhausted until all of the questions upon
which it has been ordered have been voted on, or else the effect of those
that have been voted on has been to commit the main
question, or to postpone it definitely or
indefinitely. If, before the exhaustion of the previous
question, the
questions on which it has been ordered that
have not been voted on are laid on the table, the previous
question is not exhausted thereby, so that
when they are taken from the table during the same session, they are still
under the previous question and cannot be
debated or amended or have any other subsidiary motion applied to
them.
Henry M. Robert, Robert’s Rules of Order Revised for Deliberative Assemblies
Rob Kovitz is the creator of Treyf Books, unusual appropriation-montage-remix "novels" including Pig City Model Farm, Room Behavior, According to Plan, The Sweets of Home, and the 8-volume, 4,750-page appropriation epic Ice Fishing in Gimli. His latest super-cut book project, Frequently Asked Questions—a 2-volume page-turner in which every text selection includes the word “question”—is forthcoming sometime soon.